Presentations

Abstract

When talking, speakers continuously monitor the auditory feedback of their own voice to control and inform speech production processes. When speakers are provided with auditory feedback that is perturbed in real time, most of them compensate for this by opposing the feedback perturbation. For example, when speakers hear themselves at a higher pitch than intended, they would compensate by lowering their pitch. However, sometimes speakers follow the perturbation instead (i.e., raising their pitch in response to higher-than-expected pitch). Current theoretical frameworks cannot account for following responses. In the current study, we performed two experiments to investigate whether the state of the speech production system at perturbation onset may determine what type of response (opposing or following) is given. Participants vocalized while the pitch in their auditory feedback was briefly (500 ms) perturbed in half of the vocalizations. None of the participants were aware of these manipulations. Subsequently, we analyzed the pitch contour of the participants’ vocalizations. The results suggest that whether a perturbation-related response is opposing or following unexpected feedback depends on ongoing fluctuations of the production system: It initially responds by doing the opposite of what it was doing. In addition, the results show that all speakers show both following and opposing responses, although the distribution of response types varies across individuals. Both the interaction with ongoing fluctuations and the non-trivial number of following responses suggest that current speech production models are inadequate. More generally, the current study indicates that looking beyond the average response can lead to a more complete view on the nature of feedback processing in motor control. Future work should explore whether the direction of feedback-based control in domains outside of speech production will also be conditional on the state of the motor system at the time of the perturbation.

Abstract

When talking, speakers continuously monitor and use the auditory feedback of their own voice to control and inform speech production processes. Auditory feedback processing has been studied using perturbed auditory feedback. When speakers are provided with auditory feedback that is perturbed in real time, most of them compensate for this by opposing the feedback perturbation. For example, when speakers hear themselves at a higher pitch than intended, they would compensate by lowering their pitch. However, sometimes speakers follow the perturbation instead (i.e., raising their pitch in response to higher-than-expected pitch). Although most past studies observe some following responses, current theoretical frameworks cannot account for following responses. In addition, recent experimental work has suggested that following responses may be more common than has been assumed to date.
In the current study, we performed two experiments (N = 39 and N = 24) to investigate whether the state of the speech production system at perturbation onset may determine what type of response (opposing or following) is given. Participants vocalized while they tried to match a target pitch level. Meanwhile, the pitch in their auditory feedback was briefly (500 ms) perturbed in half of the vocalizations, increasing or decreasing pitch by 25 cents. None of the participants were aware of these manipulations. Subsequently, we analyzed the pitch contour of the participants’ vocalizations.
The results suggest that whether a perturbation-related response is opposing or following unexpected feedback depends on ongoing fluctuations of the production system: It initially responds by doing the opposite of what it was doing. In addition, the results show that all speakers show both following and opposing responses, although the distribution of response types varies across individuals.
Both the interaction with ongoing fluctuations of the speech system and the non-trivial proportion of following responses suggest that current production models are inadequate: They need to account for why responses to unexpected sensory feedback depend on the production-system’s state at the time of perturbation. More generally, the current study indicates that looking beyond the average response can lead to a more complete view on the nature of feedback processing in motor control. Future work should explore whether the direction of feedback-based control in domains outside of speech production will also be conditional on the state of the motor system at the time of the perturbation.

Abstract

One of the most daunting tasks of a listener is to map a continuous auditory stream onto known speech sound categories and lexical items. A major issue with this mapping problem is the variability in the acoustic realizations of sound categories, both within and across speakers. Past research has suggested listeners may use various sources of information, such as lexical knowledge or visual cues (e.g., lip-reading) to recalibrate these speech categories to the current speaker. Previous studies have focused on audiovisual recalibration of consonant categories. The present study explores whether vowel categorization, which is known to show less sharply defined category boundaries, also benefit from visual cues.
Participants were exposed to videos of a speaker pronouncing one out of two vowels (Dutch vowels /e/ and /ø/), paired with audio that was ambiguous between the two vowels. The most ambiguous vowel token was determined on an individual basis by a categorization task at the beginning of the experiment. In one group of participants, this auditory token was paired with a video of an /e/ articulation, in the other group with an /ø/ video. After exposure to these videos, it was found in an audio-only categorization task that participants had adapted their categorization behavior as a function of the video exposure. The group that was exposed to /e/ videos showed a reduction of /ø/ classifications, suggesting they had recalibrated their vowel categories based on the available visual information. These results show that listeners indeed use visual information to recalibrate vowel categories, which is in line with previous work on audiovisual recalibration in consonant categories, and lexically-guided recalibration in both vowels and consonants.
In addition, a secondary aim of the current study was to explore individual variability in audiovisual recalibration. Phoneme categories vary not only in terms of boundary location, but also in terms of boundary sharpness, or how strictly categories are distinguished. The present study explores whether this sharpness is associated with the amount of audiovisual recalibration. The results tentatively support that a fuzzy boundary is associated with stronger recalibration, suggesting that listeners’ category sharpness may be related to the weight they assign to visual information in audiovisual speech perception. If listeners with fuzzy boundaries assign more weight to visual cues, given that vowel categories have less sharp boundaries than consonants, there ought to be audiovisual recalibration for vowels as well. This is exactly what was found in the current study.

Abstract

The classroom is designed to teach children cultural inventions for which the brain is not evolutionary designed. Hence the
classroom environment has to implement cultural reycling of neuronal maps. To do this effectively it has to recruit existing neural
infrastructure. Therefore, teaching programmes have to be tailored to the possibilities and limitations of available neural architecture.
An example in case is reading, a cultural invention of a few thousand years old. Orthographies and reading methods need
to use visual cortex areas in the most optimal way. I will discuss how the characteristics of different orthographies are tailored
to the possibilities of complex cells in visual cortex. In addition, different reading methods will be evaluated in the light of our
understanding of human brain organization. I will argue that a systematic investigation of culture-brain relations is much needed
for optimizing the optimal environment.