Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
-
Göksel, A., Taşçı, S. S., Demirel, B. E., Özparlak, E. T., Saral, B., & Dikyuva, H. (2021). Deafness in Turkey 1930–2020: Administrative, social, and cultural aspects. In R. Pfau, A. Göksel, & J. Hosemann (
Eds. ), Our Lives – Our Stories: Life Experiences of Elderly Deaf People (pp. 91-128). Berlin: De Gruyter. -
Dikyuva, H. (2017). International Sign Language Dictionary. Samsun: Ministry of Youth and Sports Publications.
-
Makaroğlu, B., & Dikyuva, H. (
Eds. ). (2017). The Contemporary Turkish Sign Language Dictionary. Ankara: Ministry of Family and Social Policies. -
Makaroğlu, B., Dikyuva, H., & Arık, E. (2017). Turkish sign language grammar. Ankara: Ministry of Family and Social Policies.
-
Dikyuva, H. (2016). Aspectual non-manual markers in Turkish Sign Language. In E. Arık (
Ed. ), Talking with Hands (pp. 297-315). Istanbul: Koç University Press. -
Dikyuva, H., Makaroğlu, B., & Arik, E. (2015). Türk İşaret Dili Dilbilgisi Kitabı (Turkish Sign Language Grammar). Ankara: Aile ve Sosyal Politikalar Bakanlığı.
-
Makaroğlu, B., & Dikyuva, H. (2015). Yabancı dil olarak Türk işaret dili öğrenci kitabı Temel (A1-A2) (Foreign Languages for Turkish Sign Language A1-A2). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
-
Zeshan, U., Escobedo Delgado, C. E., Dikyuva, H., Panda, S., & De Vos, C. (2013). Cardinal numerals in rural sign languages: Approaching cross-modal typology. Linguistic Typology, 17(3), 357-396. doi:10.1515/lity-2013-0019.
Abstract
This article presents data on cardinal numerals in three sign languages from
small-scale communities with hereditary deafness. The unusual features found
in these data considerably extend the known range of typological variety across
sign languages. Some features, such as non-decimal numeral bases, are unattested
in sign languages, but familiar from spoken languages, while others, such as subtractive sub-systems, are rare in sign and speech. We conclude that for a complete typological appraisal of a domain, an approach to cross-modal typology, which includes a typologically diverse range of sign languages in addition to spoken languages, is both instructive and feasible. -
Zeshan, U., & Dikyuva, H. (2013). Documentation of endangered sign languages: The case of Mardin Sign Language. In M. C. Jones, & S. Ogilvie (
Eds. ), Keeping Languages Alive: Documentation, Pedagogy and Revitalization (pp. 29-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. -
Dikyuva, H., Escobedo Delgado, C. E., Panda, S., & Zeshan, U. (2012). Working with village sign language communities: Deaf fieldwork researchers in professional dialogue. In U. Zeshan, & C. De Vos (
Eds. ), Sign Languages in Village Communities: Anthropological and Linguistic Insights (pp. 313-344). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. -
Dikyuva, H., Dilsiz, H., & Kihtir, N. (2011). Mardin Sign Language. In Proceedings of SIGN5 International Conference of Sign Language Users.
-
Dikyuva, H. (2011). Aspectual non-manual expressions in Turkish Sign Language (TİD). Master Thesis, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
-
Dikyuva, H., & Dilsiz, H. (2010). Mardin Sign Language. In S. Panda (
Ed. ), Proceedings of Cross-linguistic Sign Language Research (CLSLR 3). Nijmegen: Ishara Press. -
Dikyuva, H., & Zeshan, U. (2008). Turkish Sign Language: Level One (+ DVD). Nijmegen: Ishara Press.
Share this page