Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
-
Hintz, F., McQueen, J. M., & Scharenborg, O. (2016). Effects of frequency and neighborhood density on spoken-word recognition in noise: Evidence from perceptual identification in Dutch. Talk presented at the 22nd Annual Conference on Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2016),. Bilbao, ES. 2016-09-01 - 2016-09-03.
-
Hintz, F., & Scharenborg, O. (2016). The effect of background noise on the activation of phonological and semantic information during spoken word recognition. Poster presented at Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2016), Bilbao, Spain.
-
Hintz, F., & Scharenborg, O. (2016). The effect of background noise on the activation of phonological and semantic information during spoken-word recognition. Talk presented at Interspeech 2016. San Francisco, CA, USA. 2016-09-08 - 2016-09-12.
-
Van de Groep, M., Scharenborg, O., & Hintz, F. (2016). Looking at the knife when hearing "map". The engagement of one's native lexicon when recognizing non-native speech in noise. Poster presented at the Workshop on Psycholinguistic Approaches to Speech Recognition in Adverse conditions [PASRAC2], Nijmegen, NL.
-
Van de Groep, M., Scharenborg, O., & Hintz, F. (2016). Looking at the knife when hearing "map". The importance of one's native lexicon when recognizing non-native speech in noise. Poster presented at the Workshop for Young Female Researchers in Speech Science & Technology, San Francisco, CA, USA.
-
Hintz, F., & Meyer, A. S. (2013). Prediction and production of simple mathematical equations. Poster presented at the 18th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCOP 2013), Budapest, Hungary.
Abstract
An important issue in current psycholinguistics is the relationship between the production and comprehension systems. It has been argued that these systems are tightly linked, and that, in particular, listeners use the speech production system to predict upcoming content. We tested this view using a novel version of the visual world paradigm. Participants heard mathematical equations and looked at a clock face showing the numbers 1 to 12. On alternating trials they either heard a complete equation (3+8=11) or they heard the first part (3+8) and had to produce the solution (11, target hereafter) themselves. Participants were encouraged to look at the relevant numbers throughout the trial. On listening trials, the participants typically looked at the target before the onset of target name, and on speaking trials they typically looked at the target before naming it. However, the timing of the looks to the targets was slightly different, with participants looking earlier at the target when they had to speak themselves than when they listened. This suggests that predicting during listening and planning to speak are indeed very similar but not identical. The further methodological and theoretical consequences of the study will be discussed.
Share this page