Antje Meyer

Presentations

Displaying 1 - 38 of 38
  • Akamine, S., Ghaleb, E., Rasenberg, M., Fernandez, R., Meyer, A. S., & Özyürek, A. (2024). Speakers align both their gestures and words not only to establish but also to maintain reference to create shared labels for novel objects in interaction. Poster presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2024), Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Akamine, S., Ghaleb, E., Rasenberg, M., Meyer, A. S., Fernandez, R., & Özyürek, A. (2024). Speakers align both their gestures and words not only to establish but also to maintain reference to create shared labels for novel objects in interaction. Poster presented at the IMPRS Conference 2024, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Akamine, S., Ghaleb, E., Rasenberg, M., Fernández, R., Meyer, A. S., & Özyürek, A. (2024). Speakers align both their gestures and words not only to establish but also to maintain reference to create shared labels for novel objects in interaction. Poster presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Bethke, S., Meyer, A. S., & Hintz, F. (2024). Developing the Individual Differences in Language Skills (IDLaS-DE) Test Battery—A new tool for German. Talk presented at Psycholinguistics in Flanders (PiF 2024). Brussels, Belgium. 2024-05-27 - 2024-05-28.
  • Bethke, S., Meyer, A. S., & Hintz, F. (2024). Developing the Individual Differences in Language Skills (IDLaS-DE) Test Battery – A new tool for German. Poster presented at the IMPRS Conference 2024, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Bethke, S., Meyer, A. S., & Hintz, F. (2024). Developing the Individual Differences in Language Skills (IDLaS-DE) Test Battery – A new tool for German. Poster presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Bethke, S., Meyer, A. S., & Hintz, F. (2024). Developing the Individual Differences in Language Skills (IDLaS-DE) Test Battery — A new tool for German. Poster presented at the 29th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP 2024), Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Bujok, R., Meyer, A. S., & Bosker, H. R. (2024). Beat gestures can affect audiovisual lexical stress perception immediately. Talk presented at he 29th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP 2024). Edinburgh, Scotland. 2024-09-04 - 2024-09-07.
  • Corps, R. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Repetition leads to the long-term reduction of the word frequency effect. Poster presented at the 29th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP 2024), Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Decuyper, C., Corps, R. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). How stable are effects of word frequency and name agreement in picture naming? A two-session repetition priming study. Talk presented at Psycholinguistics in Flanders (PiF 2024). Brussels, Belgium. 2024-05-27 - 2024-05-28.
  • Decuyper, C., Corps, R. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). How stable are effects of word frequency and name agreement in picture naming. Poster presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Decuyper, C., Corps, R. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). How stable are effects of word frequency and name agreement in picture naming? A two-session repetition priming study. Poster presented at the 29th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP 2024), Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Frances, C., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). The effect of pitch accents on the interpretation of short exchanges. Poster presented at the 29th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP 2024), Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Hustá, C., Meyer, A. S., & Drijvers, L. (2024). Effects of relatedness between speech planning and comprehension content on attentional distribution - Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT) study. Talk presented at Psycholinguistics in Flanders (PiF 2024). Brussels, Belgium. 2024-05-27 - 2024-05-28.
  • Hustá, C., Meyer, A. S., & Drijvers, L. (2024). Using rapid invisible frequency tagging (RIFT) to probe the attentional distribution between speech planning and comprehension. Poster presented at the IMPRS Conference 2024, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Hustá, C., Meyer, A. S., & Drijvers, L. (2024). Using rapid invisible frequency tagging (RIFT) to probe the attentional distribution between speech planning and comprehension. Poster presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Hustá, C., Drijvers, L., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Effects of relatedness between speech planning and comprehension content on attentional distribution - Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT) study. Poster presented at the 29th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP 2024), Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • McConnell, K., Bethke, S., Hintz, F., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Demonstration language battery. Poster presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • McConnell, K., Hintz, F., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Individual differences in online research: Comparing lab-based and online administration of a psycholinguistic battery of linguistic and domain-general skills. Poster presented at the 29th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP 2024), Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • Meyer, A. S. (2024). Developing and validating a new battery for language skills in young adults [keynote]. Talk presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024. Nijmegen, The Netherlands. 2024-07-08 - 2024-07-11.
  • Papoutsi, C., Tourtouri, E. N., Piai, V., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). What drives word choice? Examining the role of semantic similarity and semantic neighborhood density on lexical selection. Poster presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Peirolo, M., Frances, C., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Marking our self-repairs through prosody: An automatic process?. Poster presented at the IMPRS Conference 2024, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Peirolo, M., Meyer, A. S., & Frances, C. (2024). Investigating the causes of prosodic marking in self-repairs: An automatic process?. Poster presented at Speech Prosody 2024, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Peirolo, M., Meyer, A. S., & Frances, C. (2024). Does self-correction induce contrastive stress?. Poster presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Schulz, F. M., Corps, R. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Who is a fluent speaker? Working memory might tell!. Talk presented at Psycholinguistics in Flanders (PiF 2024). Brussels, Belgium. 2024-05-27 - 2024-05-28.
  • Schulz, F. M., Corps, R. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Who is a fluent speaker? Working memory might tell us!. Poster presented at the IMPRS Conference 2024, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Schulz, F. M., Corps, R. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Who is a fluent speaker? Working memory might tell us!. Poster presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Szilagyi, I. A., Vino, A., De boer, J., Eising, E., Hintz, F., Meyer, A. S., & Fisher, S. E. (2024). Polygenic profile of individual differences in language skills in a Dutch cohort. Poster presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Uluşahin, O., Bosker, H. R., Meyer, A. S., & McQueen, J. M. (2024). Existing talker information may hinder convergence in synchronous speech. Talk presented at Psycholinguistics in Flanders (PiF 2024). Brussels, Belgium. 2024-05-27 - 2024-05-28.
  • Uluşahin, O., Bosker, H. R., McQueen, J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Existing talker knowledge may make convergence more difficult. Poster presented at the IMPRS Conference 2024, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
  • Uluşahin, O., Bosker, H. R., McQueen, J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Knowledge of a talker’s f0 affects subsequent perception of voiceless fricatives. Poster presented at Speech Prosody 2024, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Uluşahin, O., Bosker, H. R., McQueen, J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Existing talker information may hinder convergence in synchronous speech. Poster presented at the Highlights in the Language Sciences Conference 2024, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Uluşahin, O., Bosker, H. R., Meyer, A. S., & McQueen, J. M. (2024). Local F0 information outweighs talker F0 information in fricative CoG perception. Poster presented at the 29th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP 2024), Edinburgh, Scotland.
  • van der Burght, C. L., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Interindividual variation in weighting prosodic and semantic cues during sentence comprehension – a partial replication of Van der Burght et al. (2021). Poster presented at Speech Prosody 2024, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Zhou, Y., van der Burght, C. L., & Meyer, A. S. (2024). Investigating the role of semantics and perceptual salience in the memory benefit of prosodic prominence. Poster presented at Speech Prosody 2024, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Bosker, H. R., Meyer, A. S., & Maslowski, M. (2020). When speech cues are not integrated immediately: Evidence from the global speech rate effect. Poster presented at the 26th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLap 2020), Potsdam, Germany.
  • Zormpa, E., Meyer, A. S., & Brehm, L. (2020). Communicative intentions influence memory for conversations. Poster presented at the 26th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLap 2020), Potsdam, Germany.
  • Zormpa, E., Meyer, A. S., & Brehm, L. (2020). Answers are remembered better than the questions themselves. Poster presented at the Experimental Psychology Society (EPS) Meeting, Kent, Canterbury.

    Abstract

    When we communicate, we often use language to identify and successfully transmit new information. We can highlight new and important information by focussing it through pitch, syntactic structure, or semantic content. Previous work has shown that focussed information is remembered better than neutral or unfocussed information. However, most of this work has used structures, like clefts and pseudo-clefts, that are rarely found in communication. We used spoken question-answer pairs, a frequent structure where the answers are focussed relative to the questions, to examine whether answers are remembered better than questions. On each trial, participants (n=48) saw three pictures on the screen while listening to a recorded question-answer exchange between two people, such as “What should move under the crab? – The sunflower!”. In an online Yes/No recognition memory test on the next day, participants recognised the names of pictures that appeared as answers 6% more accurately than the names of pictures that appeared as questions (β = 0.27, Wald z = 4.51, 95% CI = 0.15, 0.39, p = < 0.001). Thus, linguistic focus affected memory for the words of an overheard conversation. We discuss the methodological and theoretical implications of the findings for studies of conversation.

    Additional information

    https://osf.io/w72r4/

Share this page