Presentations

Abstract

T

Abstract

Speaking requires translating concepts into a sequence of sounds. Contemporary models of language production assume that this translation involves a series of steps: from selecting the concepts to be expressed, to phonetic and articulatory encoding of the words. In addition, speakers monitor their planned output using sensorimotor predictive mechanisms. The current work concerns phonetic encoding and the speaker's monitoring of articulation. Specifically, we test whether monitoring is sensitive to the frequency of syllable-sized representations.
We run a series of immediate and delayed syllable production experiments (repetition and reading). We exploit the syllable-frequency effect: in immediate naming, high-frequency syllables are produced faster than low-frequency syllables. The effect is thought to reflect the stronger automatization of motor plan retrieval of high-frequency syllables during phonetic encoding. We predict distinct ERP and spatiotemporal patterns for high- vs. low-frequency syllables. Following articulation, we analyse auditory-evoked N1 responses that – among other features – reflect the suppression of one's own speech. Low-frequency syllables are expected to require more close monitoring, and therefore smaller N1/P2 amplitudes. The results can be important as effects of syllable frequency stand to inform us about the tradeoff between stored versus assembled representations for setting sensory targets in the production of speech.

Abstract

Speaking requires translating concepts into a sequence of sounds. Contemporary models of language production assume that this translation involves a series of steps: from selecting the concepts to be expressed, to phonetic and articulatory encoding of the words. In addition, speakers monitor their planned output using sensorimotor predictive mechanisms. The current work concerns phonetic encoding and the speaker's monitoring of articulation. Specifically, we test whether monitoring is sensitive to the frequency of syllable-sized representations.
We run a series of immediate and delayed syllable production experiments (repetition and reading). We exploit the syllable-frequency effect: in immediate naming, high-frequency syllables are produced faster than low-frequency syllables. The effect is thought to reflect the stronger automatization of motor plan retrieval of high-frequency syllables during phonetic encoding. We predict distinct ERP and spatiotemporal patterns for high- vs. low-frequency syllables. Following articulation, we analyse auditory-evoked N1 responses that – among other features – reflect the suppression of one's own speech. Low-frequency syllables are expected to require more close monitoring, and therefore smaller N1/P2 amplitudes. The results can be important as effects of syllable frequency stand to inform us about the tradeoff between stored versus assembled representations for setting sensory targets in the production of speech.

Abstract

Producing spontaneous speech is challenging. It often contains disfluencies like repetitions, prolongations, silent pauses or filled pauses. Previous research has largely focused on the language-based factors (e.g., planning difficulties) underlying the production of these disfluencies. But research has also shown that some speakers are more disfluent than others. What cognitive mechanisms underlie this difference? We reanalyzed a behavioural dataset of 112 participants, who were assessed on a battery of tasks testing linguistic knowledge, processing speed, non-verbal IQ, working memory, and basic production skills and also produced six 1-minute samples of spontaneous speech (Hintz et al., 2020). We assessed the length and lexical diversity of participants’ speech and determined how often they produced silent pauses and filled pauses. We used network analysis, factor analysis and non-parametric regressions to investigate the relationship between these variables and individual differences in particular cognitive skills. We found that individual differences in linguistic knowledge or processing speed were not related to the production of disfluencies. In contrast, the proportion of filled pauses (relative to all words in the 1-minute narratives) correlated negatively with working memory capacity.

Abstract

Convergence broadly refers to interlocutors’ tendency to progressively sound more like each other over time. Recent empirical work has used various experimental paradigms to observe convergence in voice fundamental frequency (f0). One study used stable mean f0 over trials in a synchronous speech task with manipulated (i.e., high and low) f0 conditions (Bradshaw & McGettigan, 2021). Here, we attempted to replicate this study in Dutch. First, in a reading task, participants read 40 sentences at their own pace to establish f0 baselines. Later, in a synchronous speech task, participants read 80 sentences in synchrony with a speaker whose voice was manipulated ±2st above or below (i.e., for the high and low f0 conditions, respectively) a reference mean f0 value. The reference mean f0 value and the manipulation size were obtained across multiple pre-tests. Our results revealed that the f0 manipulation significantly predicted f0 convergence in both high f0 and low f0 conditions. Furthermore, the proportion of convergers in the sample was larger than those reported by Bradshaw & McGettigan, highlighting the benefits of stimulus optimization. Our study thus provides stronger evidence that the pitch of two talkers tends to converge as they speak together.

Abstract

The semantic interference effect in picture naming entails longer naming latencies for pictures presented with semantically related versus unrelated distractors. One factor suggested to influence the effect is word category. However, results have been inconclusive. Momma et al. (2020) used a sentence-picture interference paradigm where the sentence context (“her singing” or “she’s singing”) disambiguated the word category (noun or verb, respectively) of distractor and target, manipulating their word category match/mismatch. Semantic interference was only found when distractor and target belonged to the same word category, suggesting that syntactic category constrains lexical competition during sentence production. Considering this important theoretical conclusion, we conducted a preregistered replication study with Dutch participants, mirroring the design of the original study. In each of 2 experiments, 60 native speakers read sentences containing sentence-final distractor words that had to be interpreted as nouns or verbs, depending on the sentence context. Subsequently, they named target action pictures as either verbs (experiment 1) or nouns (experiment 2). Results of Experiment 1 showed a main effect of relatedness, suggesting a semantic interference effect regardless of word category. We discuss differences between the original and current study results with cross-linguistic differences in (de)compositional processing and frequency of distractor forms.

Abstract

When we communicate, we often use language to identify and successfully transmit new information. We can highlight new and important information by focussing it through pitch, syntactic structure, or semantic content. Previous work has shown that focussed information is remembered better than neutral or unfocussed information. However, most of this work has used structures, like clefts and pseudo-clefts, that are rarely found in communication. We used spoken question-answer pairs, a frequent structure where the answers are focussed relative to the questions, to examine whether answers are remembered better than questions. On each trial, participants (n=48) saw three pictures on the screen while listening to a recorded question-answer exchange between two people, such as “What should move under the crab? – The sunflower!”. In an online Yes/No recognition memory test on the next day, participants recognised the names of pictures that appeared as answers 6% more accurately than the names of pictures that appeared as questions (β = 0.27, Wald z = 4.51, 95% CI = 0.15, 0.39, p = < 0.001). Thus, linguistic focus affected memory for the words of an overheard conversation. We discuss the methodological and theoretical implications of the findings for studies of conversation.

Abstract

Individual differences in language processing are prevalent in our daily lives. However, for decades, psycholinguistic research has largely ignored variation in the normal range of abilities. Recently, scientists have begun to acknowledge the importance of inter-individual variability for a comprehensive characterization of the language system. In spite of this change of attitude, empirical research on individual differences is still sparse, which is in part due to the lack of a suitable research tool. Here, we present a novel battery of behavioral tests for assessing individual differences in language skills in younger adults. The Dutch prototype comprises 29 subtests and assesses many aspects of language knowledge (grammar and vocabulary), linguistic processing skills (word and sentence level) and general cognitive abilities involved in using language (e.g., WM, IQ). Using the battery, researchers can determine performance profiles for individuals and link them to neurobiological or genetic data.