During speech production, we continuously monitor what we say. In
situations in which speech errors potentially have more severe
consequences, e.g. during a public presentation, our verbal selfmonitoring
system may pay special attention to prevent errors than in
situations in which speech errors are more acceptable, such as a casual
conversation. In an event-related potential study, we investigated
whether or not motivation affected participants’ performance using a
picture naming task in a semantic blocking paradigm. Semantic
context of to-be-named pictures was manipulated; blocks were
semantically related (e.g., cat, dog, horse, etc.) or semantically
unrelated (e.g., cat, table, flute, etc.). Motivation was manipulated
independently by monetary reward. The motivation manipulation did
not affect error rate during picture naming. However, the highmotivation
condition yielded increased amplitude and latency values of
the error-related negativity (ERN) compared to the low-motivation
condition, presumably indicating higher monitoring activity. Furthermore,
participants showed semantic interference effects in reaction
times and error rates. The ERN amplitude was also larger during
semantically related than unrelated blocks, presumably indicating that
semantic relatedness induces more conflict between possible verbal
responses.