Gesturing when common ground exists: Is gesture rate determined by cognitive load or communicative context?
Common ground (CG), i.e. the knowledge, beliefs and assumptions that interlocutors mutually share
in interaction, is fundamental t
o successful communication (Clark, 1996). An increasing number of
studies have shown that speakers use co
-
speech gestures at the same rate (or even higher) when
they share CG as opposed to when they do not (e.g. Campisi & Ozyurek, 2013; Holler & Wilkin, 20
09;
Holler, Tutton & Wilkin, 2011). There are two alternative explanations for this finding. On the one
hand, it has been argued that mentally representing our addressee’s knowledge can require
considerable cognitive effort (Pickering & Garrod, 2004). Henc
e, gesture rate may be high in CG
contexts because the cognitive effort involved in mentally representing CG is considerable. In
contrast, this high gesture rate may be due to the fact that gestures play an important
communicative role, even when conveying
information that is already mutually shared (Holler &
Wilkin, 2009). The present study tested these two hypotheses by combining the manipulation of CG
with a manipulation of communicative context. We used a 2(CG) x 3(communication context)
between
-
partici
pants design (18 participants per condition, N=108). All participants watched a short
film and narrated it to their addressee. Addressees had either seen parts of the film together with
the speaker (CG) or not (no
-
CG). In addition, we manipulated communica
tive context by asking
speakers to narrate their story either face
-
to
-
face, via an occluding screen, or into a tape
-
recorder, a
manipulation that has been shown to affect gesture rate in no
-
CG contexts (Bavelas et al., 2008).
Our results revealed a signifi
cant main effect of communicative context, with gesture rate being
highest in the face
-
to
-
face condition, followed by the screen condition, and lowest in the tape
-
recorder condition. Importantly, we did not find a main effect of common ground on gesture ra
te,
and no interaction between our two factors. This finding supports the hypothesis that gestures
representing CG information are communicatively intended as opposed to being triggered by an
increased cognitive load.
Publication type
TalkPublication date
2014
Share this page