Stephanie Forkel

Publications

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
  • Forkel, S. J., & Catani, M. (2019). Diffusion imaging methods in language sciences. In G. I. De Zubicaray, & N. O. Schiller (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Neurolinguistics (pp. 212-228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Abstract

    The field of neuroanatomy of language is moving forward at a fast pace. This
    progression is partially due to the development of diffusion tractography, which
    has been used to describe white matter connections in the living human brain.
    For the field of neurolinguistics this advancement is timely and important for
    two reasons. First, it allows clinical researchers to liberate themselves from
    neuroanatomical models of language derived from animal studies. Second, for
    the first time, it offers the possibility of testing network correlates of
    neurolinguistic models directly in the human brain. This chapter introduces the
    reader to general principles of diffusion imaging and tractography. Examples of
    its applications, such as tract analysis, will be used to explicate its potentials and
    limitations.
  • Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Friedrich, P., & Forkel, S. J. (2019). One size fits all does not apply to brain lateralisation. Physics of Life Reviews, 30, 30-33. doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2019.07.007.

    Abstract

    Our understanding of the functioning of the brain is primarily based on an average model of the brain's functional organisation, and any deviation from the standard is considered as random noise or a pathological appearance. Studying pathologies has, however, greatly contributed to our understanding of brain functions. For instance, the study of naturally-occurring or surgically-induced brain lesions revealed that language is predominantly lateralised to the left hemisphere while perception/action and emotion are commonly lateralised to the right hemisphere. The lateralisation of function was subsequently replicated by task-related functional neuroimaging in the healthy population. Despite its high significance and reproducibility, this pattern of lateralisation of function is true for most, but not all participants. Bilateral and flipped representations of classically lateralised functions have been reported during development and in the healthy adult population for language, perception/action and emotion. Understanding these different functional representations at an individual level is crucial to improve the sophistication of our models and account for the variance in developmental trajectories, cognitive performance differences and clinical recovery. With the availability of in vivo neuroimaging, it has become feasible to study large numbers of participants and reliably characterise individual differences, also referred to as phenotypes. Yet, we are at the beginning of inter-individual variability modelling, and new theories of brain function will have to account for these differences across participants.

Share this page